Every morning I look for new music. Here are a few tunes that flavored my dreams and hopes this year —becoming the soundtrack of my reality.
Presidential hopeful Donald J. Trump touts to his base in Hershey, Pennsylvania. The live broadcast by The Washington Post caught 104 viewers. Conversely, Fox News could brag about the 14,800 plus consumers glued to Trump’s rhetoric. And it’s hard to defend Hillary Clinton, or claim she’s a better choice. Clinton is business as usual; American politicians policing the world and destroying their home in the process.
The contrast in numbers on these two competing news organizations says a lot. I was foolish enough to believe Trump was losing steam when I noticed how few were watching him via the Post. Then I came to, switched my feed to Fox, and enjoyed my hope disappear while sipping my glass of merlot.
According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, on average, about 58.6 percent of Americans have bothered to vote in a presidential election since 2000. In 2012, a mere 57.5 percent of Americans cast a vote for president, which is a larger turnout than the 2000 race where only 54.2 percent elected their commander in chief.
But our lives, and happiness, are our responsibility. No matter who wins this bloody election, and decides to devour this sad, egotistical country — we’re doomed. Most days I can only rationalize enough energy to hope we don’t get what we deserve.
Overcast, 84 degrees. No breeze. Hot coffee, good tunes. Drifting through the fog of a fantastic, dreamy mood. Rain, or the hope thereof, gets me clear every time. Reprieve; let’s write.
Then, the sprinkling begins. Creosote in the air. Humidity climbs. We should go on holiday, he thinks. But, just in town. A lovely, bitty jaunt away from our relentless summer months in Tucson. She’s magical, but life got in the way this afternoon. Can we dance tonight, babe, he asks. Either to remember or forget, your call, love.
Two days before Super Tuesday — the most pivotal day for the presidential primaries in the United States — a pro-Bernie Sanders march took place in at least 40 cities nationwide without a single report from major news outlets.
U.S. Uncut, a grassroots direct action political organization, wrote, “thousands of cheering Bernie supporters have packed metropolitan sidewalks and streets, further cementing the rallying cry that the Bernie phenomenon is more than a Presidential campaign.”
Although the group does not feign an objective voice, what does this alarming lack of coverage in large cities like New York, Boston and Los Angeles tell your average American citizen?
How can this type of national mobilization not be timely, or not effect the cities that are hosting these marches?
By definition, the events taking place across the U.S., on Saturday, Feb. 27, are newsworthy, but where are our nation’s watchdogs, beat reporters or valiant champions of writing “All the News That’s Fit to Print”?
A street lined with bustling markets in Beirut, Lebanon was rocked by two suicide bombers on Thursday, Nov. 12, killing 42 civilians. The following evening, Paris streets were sieged by three teams of ISIL attackers that left 129 people dead and 352 others wounded.
Regarding the socially scarring human loss, both tragedies were equally horrific but many questioned the difference in coverage.
Paris’ tragedy dominated the front page of The New York Times for three days, and from what I’ve read, for appropriate newsworthy reasons. Firstly, the City of Light was dimmed by an act of terrorism that was strategic and complicated in form. Also, this attack proved that ISIL could strike far outside its stronghold in the Middle East.
Furthermore, since September 11, 2001, the U.S. has struggled with spying on its citizens, waging covert anti-terrorism crusades or simply bolstering national security – so all eyes were on another free society struck by “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents.”
David Uberti, of the Columbia Journalism Review, wrote the lopsided coverage last weekend should not be oversimplified, and Western frontpage treatment is ultimately weighted by “surprise, impact and resonance” regarding acts of terrorism.
Frankly, Uberti is quite correct even though I begrudgingly agree with his points.
But, this disproportional attention raises innumerable questions.
Are we still blinded by the cultural ignorances we created with Orientalism? As journalists, how can we make the Middle East more relatable to American or Westernized societies? Can we realistically justify this type of asymmetrical news importance? And dare I ask, are we part of problem or can we, as an industry, become the change we wish to see?
After three days, Beirut was revisited and The Times’ headline read the city felt “forgotten.”
The professional journalists responsible for documenting unbiased history in real time apparently failed Beirut, maybe humanity at large, and further corroborated what’s past is prologue.
According to United Nations sources, there are approximately 150 million street children throughout the world. “Chased from home by violence, drug and alcohol abuse, the death of a parent, family breakdown, war, natural disaster or simply socio-economic collapse,” read the report. “Many destitute children are forced to eke out a living on the streets, scavenging, begging, hawking in the slums and polluted cities of the developing world.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate there are about 780 million people worldwide that don’t have access to clean water or proper sanitation.
As of January last year, on any given night there are about 578,424 homeless people in America, read the report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The National Sexual Violence Resource Center estimates one in five women will be raped at some point in their lives.
Furthermore the CDC documented in 2010 alone, 4,828 young people between the ages of 10 and 24 were victims of homicide, which is about 13 deaths per day.
And a coffee cup design can potentially ruin your Christmas?
Click the crusty link below to get some full tilt Del Grande.
Abstract painter Sheryl Holland is a local auteur of emotive creation. She mixes paint on large palettes, and continues the visual blends upon the canvas. Holland’s big brushes swirl lakes of acrylic, then her eyes and mood begin working, she said.
“Nothing to guide me but my eye; it’s ‘action painting’” Holland said.
Her technique was derived from the infamous 1950s American expressionist, Jackson Pollock. Like Pollock, her process is emotive, intuitive but very conscience of composition and visual balance, she said.
After graduating with a master’s degree in fine art from the University of Michigan, Holland taught art classes at a local high school. Now, Holland paints every day while enjoying her time in The Old Pueblo, she said.
But Holland’s second career as a full-time artist is quite demanding and extremely rewarding.
“It’s the most challenging and exciting thing I’ve ever done in my life,” Holland said. “It’s like being a jazz improviser.”
Holland will be showcasing her work during the Tucson Pima Arts Council Open Studio Tour on Nov. 14-15, at the Second Street gallery, located at 3025 E. Second St.
The space is Holland’s second home since participating in the event for the past seven years. And the cozy, pop-up museum is housed in a friend’s backyard, she explained, with a warm laugh.
Holland said one of her favorite paintings will be among the 50 pieces she has for sale. “Desert Walk” contains the colors she uses most, it displays a strong visual design and also evokes personal memories of living on the outskirts of town, she said.
“It reminds me of the many walks that I’ve had,” Holland said.
And while it’s great to make money that’s not her only motivation for having a show.
“It’s nice to sell work, but that’s not the major reason,” Holland said. “It’s a chance to just share my art with the public.”
Bernie Sanders continues his captivating speeches while traveling the country on the campaign trail. He brings “Democratic-Socialists” to their feet at political rallies, and studio audiences cheer after his subtle rhetoric. He makes great points about the political process in the U.S. and its vast amount of financial pitfalls regarding lobbyists – as well as the massive amount of stateside inequities. His pep rally nonsense, littered with statistics most people know all too well, is daunting, truthful, engaging and refreshing to hear from a presidential hopeful.
But I don’t care.
Sanders will not secure the Democratic nomination. But for argument’s sake, let’s say he does and actually wins the general election. Upon taking office, Sanders will be rendered as useless as his socialist banter after moving to Pennsylvania Ave.
You’re going to save the middle class, Mr. Sanders? You’re also going to dismantle and properly reconstruct the corporate tax-structure? Plus you’re going to stop the U.S. gun lobby?
Like most hardworking journalists my single question to the Bern-Unit is, says whom? And my English friends would further ask, “are you taking the piss?”
Honestly, I completely agree with Sanders and concurrently understand attacking Capitol Hill head-on gets you nowhere. If elected, we would pay Sanders $400,000 per year to be just as abortive as the Occupy Wall Street movement. Grand ideas and big talk are just that, and that alone. The political process in Washington happens between the aisles of its opposite sides. As a prospective presidential candidate, American citizen and everyone in-between if you believe otherwise I have a bridge to sell you. It’s historic, iconic, it was completed in 1883, it connects the Lower East Side of Manhattan to Brooklyn – and I only accept cash.
Like it or not, the U.S. is a capitalist society. Our financial moves and focus sway the global economy in ways most sovereign nations dream about and will never experience. And come next November, Sanders and his supporters believe they can attack special interest groups that fund The Star-Spangled monetary juggernaut?
According to The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan political finance research group, in 2013 the National Rifle Association spent $3.4 million lobbying to protect U.S. gun rights. Within the same year, the cumulative GDP for South America was approximately $6.1 million.
Some days I envy the general public, the wistful political-romantics and idealistic activists still fueling their carbon-filtered fire on “Hope” or “Change.” But if I want to watch fictitious yarns from inside the Beltway the trove of “West Wing” seasons are free online.
Regarding politicizing mass shootings in the U.S., Mr. Obama said, “This is a political choice that we make – to allow this to happen every few months in America. We, collectively, are answerable to those families who lose their loved ones, because of our inaction.”